Modernism: Puiforcat and Lobel

“Modernism was not conceived as a style but a loose collection of ideas. It [is] a term that [covers] a range of movements in art, architecture, design, and literature, which largely rejected the styles that came before it.”[i] Between the World Wars “[this] methodology flourished in Germany and Holland, as well as in Moscow, Paris, Prague, and New York.”[ii] Typically Modernism embraced innovation, abandoned traditional approaches such as realism, experimented with form with a tendency towards abstraction, and emphasized new materials, techniques, and processes. “At the core of Modernism lay the idea that the world had to be fundamentally rethought.”[iii] Its proponents would ultimately take their “cue from technology, factories, practicality, and usefulness.”[iv]

The silversmiths Jean Puiforcat and Paul Lobel are just two of the many artists who embraced the Modernist style. Both are represented within the Kamm Collection. In this blog post we will take a closer look at these works.

JEAN EMILE PUIFORCAT (French, 1897-1945)

The “silversmith-sculptor” Jean Puiforcat initially wanted to become an architect.[v] However, after the First World War, he decided to join the family’s silversmithing business which had been founded by his great-grandfather in 1820.[vi] Puiforcat began as an apprentice learning the basic techniques and processes at their shop in the Marais district of Paris.[vii] While working on his apprenticeship he also studied sculpture at artist Louis-Aimé Lejeune’s atelier.[viii] These dual pursuits led Puiforcat to develop a personal aesthetic that eliminated “superfluous forms and ornamentation,” especially “the aberrant ones associated with the then démodé Art Nouveau movement.”[ix] Eventually, he decided that an object could not “realize its inherent beauty” unless its design was reduced to its basic function.[x]

In 1925 Puiforcat filled almost an entire pavilion at the groundbreaking International Exhibition of Modern Decorative and Industrial Arts (Exposition Internationale des Arts Décoratifs et Industriels Modernes) in Paris. These works, which all sought harmony between the object and its function, incorporated clean lines and “cleverly architectured surfaces.”[xi] Their simplicity was often offset by sumptuous materials such as exotic stones or wood. Admirers praised Puiforcat’s “mastery as a silversmith, sculptor, and colorist” while critics questioned their “mechanical beauty.”[xii] Nevertheless, following the 1925 Exposition, Puiforcat’s work rose in popularity and his name became “synonymous with Art Deco glamour” as well as luxurious highly skilled craftsmanship.[xiii]

The Kamms have eight works by Puiforcat in their collection. These objects range from tea and coffee sets to single teapot forms. As you study these designs you can see elements of Puiforcat’s evolving style. Traditional floral ornamentation present in the early 1920s eventually gave way to a study of the cube. Then, Puiforcat’s focus turned to mathematically calculated curving lines. He was always pushing himself to further develop his work. Puiforcat stated, “If there is one wish expressed in my objects, it is not that of wanting to be tied to a formula, but of hoping one day to attain what I sense, but can’t yet express…”[xiv]

Within the Kamm Collection there is a Puiforcat sterling silver teapot (c. 1937) that is particularly striking. This prow-shaped teapot was created after careful investigation of arithmetical, harmonic, and geometric principles as well as the concept known as the golden section. These studies stimulated his examination of the curve. For Puiforcat, it seems that a simple curving line could determine an entire form. A pencil drawing of the Kamm’s teapot, which is located at the Cooper Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum in New York, reflects this observation.

It is important to note that while Puiforcat pursued “the possibilities of form,” he also continued his “experimentation with different materials.”[xv] This teapot in the Kamm Collection is a perfect example. The knob on its lid as well as the handle are made of rock crystal.[xvi] Puiforcat also utilized vermeil, which coats the interior of the pot in addition to multiple rings on the handle.[xvii] These innovative simplified touches seem to further emphasize the form and function.[xviii] In fact, it could be argued that these new components only contributed to the “je ne sais quoi” that was always present in Puiforcat’s work.[xix]

PAUL A. LOBEL (American, born Romania, 1899 – 1983)